It is often argued that greater transparency of the trading process enhances market liquidity by reducing the opportunities for taking advantage of less informed participants. We provide a model to investigate a possible basis for this view. We compare the price formation process in several trading systems, that differ in their degree of transparency: an ideal fully transparent auction, a continuous auction, a batch auction and a stylized dealer market. We show that the presumption that greater transparency generates lower trading costs for uninformed traders has an analytical basis, but that it needs important qualifications as a general statement.
Download is not available