We investigate the effect of the ability of “non-traditional” funds to short-sell the equity of their debtors. This enables the funds to vote on the restructuring proposals of distressed firms, while at the same time they separate their voting rights from their economic exposure. The effect on firm value depends on the discrepancy between the markets for debt and equity, discrepancy in how each assesses the probability of a proposal being accepted. We show that if the assessments between the two markets are different than the presence of a non-traditional fund decreases firm value. Firm value, however, is unaffected if the assessments are the same.
This paper is no longer available, the revised version of this
paper can be found above as Working Paper Series No 21 FMG Discussion Paper No 672, February 2011
